
The long (and extremely boring) zoning saga
Since our opening nine months ago, Campground has become an integral part of the Sea Cliff community, fostering a welcoming environment for families and individuals alike. Our unwavering commitment has always been to contribute positively to the energy and vitality of the village. We have strived to create an inclusive space that brings people of all ages and backgrounds together.
From the very beginning, we envisioned Campground as a place that would attract patrons and foster year-round engagement with the local community. We understood that the exterior of our property played a crucial role in realizing this dream. Consequently, our requests for modifications and changes from the Sea Cliff Zoning Board of Appeals were driven by our desire to ensure the long-term success of Campground and to create equal opportunities for our business, mirroring those enjoyed by other establishments in the village. It is worth noting that we received an overwhelming amount of support, with over 600 letters advocating for our plans and garnering significant public backing.
During our pursuit of the required approvals, it became evident that the Zoning Board of Appeals' previous determination in 2022, which granted us a non-conforming use variance instead of a special use permit, was based on a limited understanding of our operation. The ZBA concluded at that time that our establishment, encompassing aspects of both a restaurant and a retail space, and did not fit into any specific category and thus was considered non-conforming. In simple terms, the combination of two individually permissible elements was in their opinion a non-permitted use.
Excerpt from 2022 ZBA desicion
Because of this determination in 2022, we were not operating under a special use permit like all other establishments in Sea Cliff, but were instead given a go ahead to operate as a non-conforming use, as it was deemed that our use was less intense than the use before us (an automobile repair shop and towing company). However, this situation “trapped” us in a position where any modifications to our outdoor area necessitate a land use variance. Unfortunately, obtaining such a variance is extremely challenging, making it practically impossible to attain.(we could go into the weeds here, but the sheer legalese might literally bore you to death.)
The incredibly high bar of getting a use variance.
Through a long-winded and extremely costly process, our only way out was to respectfully argue that the 2022 decision should be reconsidered by the Board, as in our opinion it was not based on a complete assessment of the circumstances surrounding our business now that are now in full operation.
We, and the legal professionals we retained, believed that our situation warranted a modification of the conformity determination, taking into account the true nature of our operations now that we are in fact up and running. By considering the evidence, we hoped to demonstrate that our use was in fact conforming and subsequently shouldn’t require the (next to impossible) standards of a use variance.
Still reading? Wow. Ok. Here’s some more information.
Conformity determination of current and future use of Campground.
In an effort to navigate through this complex situation, we aimed to present a compelling case to the Sea Cliff Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) demonstrating that we are indeed conforming to and operating within the existing zoning laws of Sea Cliff. If the ZBA had been open to hearing and accepting our argument, they could have granted us a Special Use Permit as a restaurant, establishing a clear regulatory framework for our operation, similar to the majority of establishments in Sea Cliff. By categorizing us as a permitted use, it would eliminate the need for a convoluted use variance and enable us to utilize the outdoor area of our property through a straightforward special use permit provision.
Digging deeper into the zoning of Business Zone A of Sea Cliff, the following uses are permitted without special use permit:
Club or community center.
Retail store, shop or personal service establishment.
Public or private office
And with a special use permit:
Restaurant
Bank drive-in windows.
One dwelling unit per 4,000 square feet of lot size
Workroom of a craftsman or tradesman
Gasoline service station
Licensed nursery school and licensed day-care center
Accessory uses
We firmly assert that our retail store component should not be questioned under the existing zoning regulations. It falls squarely within the boundaries of the current zoning law and is fully permitted. The question is really about how the rest of our operation should be evaluated.
Most of Sea Cliff's establishments, regulated by the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), are categorized as restaurants. The current zoning code defines a restaurant as a place "where all food is prepared, served, and consumed on the premises." This definition, being inherently broad and vague, has historically allowed for different operational models and interpretations by the ZBA. A closer examination of neighboring businesses in Business Zone A, which hold active restaurant special use permits, reveals that the definition of "where all food is prepared, served, and consumed on the premises" can be applied to various circumstances, with deviations from the strict interpretation.
Sea Cliff currently accommodates a wide range of establishments operating under a restaurant special use permit, including cafes, shaved ice stores, and delis. As we do prepare, serve and have food consumed on our premise, it becomes evident that classifying our operation as non-conforming is unjustified and unreasonable. In fact, compared to certain other establishments, our operation aligns far more closely with the apparent definition of a restaurant.
Additionally, treating a combination of permitted uses as non-conforming lacks a regulatory basis or written standards to support the notion that "two rights make a wrong." To us, this argument makes no sense, and would in that case create numerous situations where other operators who are already mixing retail and restaurant offerings should be seen as non-conforming. if that is to be the standard, we think there should be consistent application rather than a selective literal interpretation solely in our case.
I sorta get it, but then what happened?
Recognizing the diverse interpretations of what defines a "restaurant," we wanted to assert that our operation should be classified as such. Our operational model clearly aligns with the definition of a restaurant to a significant extent, with only a small portion (15%) dedicated to retail sales. We wanted to firmly advocate for a revision of the Board's current determination that categorizes Campground as non-conforming, instead reclassifying it as a restaurant subject to regulation under a special use permit. This reclassification would grant us the same privileges enjoyed by the majority of businesses in the village, allowing us to theoretically have outdoor seating and picnic tables, which is a simple yet essential amenity for our patrons.
The process for such rehearing is set forth in the Village Law, which requires a motion by a Board member and a unanimous determination by the Board to reopen the hearing.
The board unanimously refused to even hear our argument. 😤 🤯
This action by the Sea Cliff zoning board effectively creates an insurmountable roadblock when it comes to the use of our outside area, which ensures that any attempt by Campground to make use of our outdoor space is for the foreseeable future deemed as a non-permitted use.
It is disheartening to see such an important matter being so myopically and subjectively decided without wider consideration of the life-or-death significance that outdoor seating can bring to local businesses like ours. Frankly, the ZBA’s decision seems to be at direct odds with the Mayor’s and Trustee’s commitment to helping small businesses in Sea Cliff succeed. Moreover, the lack of transparency in the decision-making process and the appearance of a predetermined outcome decided in the backrooms of our village hall is deeply concerning and undermines the trust we place in our local authorities. We firmly believe that decisions concerning our community's business development should be made with fairness, objectivity, and a genuine understanding of the potential positive impact they can have, rather than adherence to a maze-like and antiquated zoning code that gets selectively applied based on personal relationships and insider access. It is imperative that our zoning board take into account the diverse needs and aspirations of the community it serves, and seek to find ways of helping rather than employing tactics of arbitrary denial and “gotcha” legal jousting.
The final verdict
It's important to highlight that the board's final decision did include some favorable modifications to our indoor operations. We have been granted the ability to extend our operating hours until 1AM on Fridays and Saturdays, and our occupancy limit has been increased from 48 to 74. Additionally, we have been permitted to establish a coffee operation in the future.
While we appreciate these adjustments to our operations, it is also important to note that they provide only a minimal financial impact and hold limited significance for the long-term sustainability of our business. The use of our entire property was a crucial aspect of our request, as we believed it would provide us with a fair opportunity to compete and ensure our viability in the area.
The final minutes can be found here
Holy shit that was a lot of information I barely understand. but how can I help you get picnic tables outside?
The Sea Cliff Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) plays a crucial role in our local governance, and it is essential that they operate independently from the Mayor and the board of trustees. Unfortunately, it appears that a degree of subjectivity, favoritism, and inconsistent application of zoning laws and standards has been prevalent in the board's historical practices. This raises concerns about whether the board truly acts in the best interest of the village and responds to the requests and concerns of Sea Cliff residents and acts in their best interest.
Regrettably, our story of adversity and challenges is not unique, as numerous small businesses have experienced the subjective and sometimes inexplicable decisions made by the board. Given that the board operates under the authority of the Mayor and trustees, our only recourse is to petition our elected representatives in the local government and express our collective disappointment regarding the negative impact that such situations create. We hope that our voices will be heard and that our elected officials will take into consideration our concerns and take appropriate action.
Ultimately, we firmly believe that the village should foster the most favorable conditions for small businesses like ours to not just survive but thrive. Small businesses like ours contribute significantly to the vitality and sense of community in Sea Cliff by providing meaningful venues for interaction and camaraderie. We have previously had direct conversations with the Mayor and trustees who have expressed support for this sentiment. It is our sincere hope that they will follow through on their words by implementing meaningful actions that create an atmosphere of opportunity and vibrancy in the village, rather than leaving storefronts empty and limiting the potential for growth.
I’m ready. What government official can I email to express my concerns about this topic?
Glad you asked. Here is a list of emails for all the government officials whose job it is to oversee the Zoning Board Of Appeals and ensure a thriving economic landscape in the village. We suggest you make your feelings in this matter heard.
Elana Villafane (Mayor):
evillafane@seacliff-ny.gov
James Versocki (Trustee):
jversocki@seacliff-ny.gov
Tannaz Nasirzadeh-Balooch (Trustee):
Tbalooch@seacliff-ny.gov
Mark Sobel (Trustee):
msobel@seacliff-ny.gov
Nick Pinto (Trustee):
Npinto@seacliff-ny.gov